Kona Coffee
Booms
but... Can there be peace,
stability,
and prosperity in our industry.
by Les Drent
 
Coffee Pickers on the
Big Island of Hawaii. |
A bountiful 1997 Kona coffee harvest is upon us and
strong growth in our industry seems to be upon us as
well. The high demand for Kona coffee around the world
and increasing cherry prices have resulted in widespread
planting of coffee by small to large size farms all
around Kona. Kona coffee has not seen a growth spurt
in its planted acreage since its downturn in 1958 when
there was an estimated 6,800 acres of planted coffee
in Kona. These new plantings are apparent from Holualoa
to Honaunau and for the first time in the last two years
it is a pleasure to see bulldozers tearing through the
landscape and making way for coffee trees as opposed
to another chain store being erected in Kailua. Coffee
acreage in Kona which was estimated at around 1,700
acres three years ago is now believed to be cresting
the 2,000 acre mark.
The Ups & Downs
of Kona Coffee
ACREAGE
1898 .......... 6,400
1900 .......... 4,000
1930 .......... 6,000
1947 .......... 3,400
1958 .......... 6,800
1962 .......... 5,100
1991 .......... 1,600
1997 .......... 2,000
CHERRY PRICES
(per pound)
1910 ........ 1.6 ¢
1919 ........ 4.1 ¢
1921 ........ 1.9 ¢
1925 ........ 4.5 ¢
1938 ........ 1 ¢
1956 ........ 12 ¢
1969 ........ 5 ¢
1977 ........ 31 ¢
1989 ........ $1.00
1993 ........ 65 ¢
1997 ........ $1.15
|
The coffee cherry that is already making its way to
the various mills around Kona this fall is reported
to be of excellent quality. Unlike the beginning of
last year's harvest, which was reportedly one of the
worst in nearly a half century, this year's picking
could produce a bumper crop. Some early estimates by
local farmers place production up nearly 40%. Mother
nature has been kind indeed.
Outside of the healthy harvest and nearly a year after
Kona coffee made national headlines in the major bust
of Kona Kai farms and their fraudulent Kona coffee scheme,
the fallout from this incident still swirls through
the coffee lands of Kona. A host of questions regarding
the future of Kona coffee, protection of the name "Kona"
and the future stability of this product still remain
to be answered. Among these matters of name protection
are new concerns regarding the profitability of coffee
farming in Kona. These matters include the renegotiations
of Bishop Estate farm leases, redefining the existing
blended Kona coffee market, coffee certification, and
the potential for one democratic governing Kona coffee
organization. Out of all this one must ask if there
can there be peace, stability and prosperity in the
Kona coffee industry?
 
From left to right: Walter
Diaz, Benji Pali, and Tory Aquino of Captain Cook
Coffee Company prepare for a busy season of coffee
processing as this year's crop begins to show up
at mills all around Kona. |
Name protection seems to be at the forefront of concern
for many coffee farmers in Kona. The history surrounding
the protection of the name Kona is a relatively recent
issue. During the late 1800's and continuing into the
1900's the Kona coffee crop and its distribution on
the mainland was always controlled by a few large mainland
based American companies, such as American Factors,
Ltd., which used Kona coffee as a master blend. The
exploitation of Japanese laborers to plant, grow, and
harvest the coffee in Kona is what allowed the industry
to flourish in those early years. At the turn of the
century the world coffee market collapsed and along
with it went the value of Kona coffee. The land owned
by the large commercial coffee companies was then leased
to Japanese farmers in exchange for half of their yearly
crop.
Over the years leading up to the 1950's these Japanese
farmers slowly gained control of their lands and began
purchasing their land from the mills. For many years
leading up to modern times the coffee industry in Kona
was restricted to farming only and farmers had very
little to do with the sale of their coffee. Thus the
prices of Kona were subject to busts and booms according
to the status of the world coffee market. Farmers had
very little if any feeling of stability in their yearly
coffee crop and it was widely believed that only a fool
would rely on the price of coffee maintaining its value.
The unreliability of coffee prices resulted in a steady
decline of coffee acreage for nearly forty years.
 
Man rakes parchment at
Greenwell Farm, which is open to the public for
tours daily. |
Beginning in the 1970's the coffee industry in Kona
would plant the seeds of change with the arrival of
mainland Americans. Many of whom came to Kona to escape
the turmoil of their modern era. As Vietnam splintered
America and the suburban nine to five work routine proved
to be all too restrictive for many looking for personal
freedom and peace of mind in their lives Hawaii seemed
like the perfect getaway point. Kona in particular was
a popular choice for many who came and settled on 45
year agricultural leases developed by Kamehameha Schools
Bishop Estate. While it didn't take much to get by in
Kona in those days, what little it did take was hard
to come by. Coffee prices were unstable and at 31¢
a pound (compared to $1.15 today) being offered for
coffee cherry in 1977 the best a single farmer could
do picking his own seasonal coffee (about 200 pounds)
in a day was $62. Subsequently many farmers in Kona
turned to growing pakalolo (marijuana) to subsidize
their living. This part of coffee history in Kona has
been widely omitted from the history books, but ask
any honest farmer who has been farming coffee in Kona
since those days and you are certain to hear the truth.
They will also tell you that even the old folks were
growing the "Kona Gold" in the back yard.
As independence among Kona coffee farmers grew during
the 1980's, and the DEA was in full swing of its widespread
Green Harvest marijuana eradication program farmers
in Kona took notice of another industry starting to
root itself in the American market place, specialty
coffee. As farmers, millers, and roasters began to realize
the potential of their product being self-marketed so
also did they realize the extent of exploitation that
now gripped their product name. Kona, in most cases,
had become a meaningless name on the side of many coffee
packages. With the American specialty coffee industry
beginning to blossom, it was now obvious that if Kona
was to compete in this marketplace, it would have to
do so against its greatest competitor, the counterfeiter.
While this competitor lurked in the midst of name brand
America it was difficult to place a finger on who exactly
was promoting and selling this illegitimate Kona coffee.
In the Fall of 1996, you may remember, national headlines
read aloud that a culprit had been caught. After Coffee
Times first reported to you in 1994 our suspicions about
Kona Kai Farms, the truth surfaced last year as indictments
were handed down after a six month sting operation by
US Customs agents revealed illegal rebagging practices
in Oakland California. The 20 million dollar fraudulent
coffee scheme was evidenced by video tapes of Kona Kai
employees rebagging Costa Rican and Panamanian coffee
in Kona coffee bags. The two to three dollar coffee
was then resold for nearly seven dollars a pound as
Kona coffee. While the news left a black eye on the
industry, it was also an enormous victory for local
coffee farmers, and it marked the first time that government
intervened to protect the name Kona from counterfeiters.
The case continues to unfold today as new indictments
are being handed down.
 
Luis Cisneros of Bay
View Farm. |
Currently, a class-action lawsuit filed by an Oahu
law firm, Davis Levin Livingston Grande, on behalf of
a few Kona farmers has stirred more controversy in the
Kona coffee industry. The law suit aimed at several
buyers of Kona coffee who purchased bogus Kona coffee
from Kona Kai Farms alleges that they knowingly did
so and at the expense of the Kona name. It would be
apparent to most Kona coffee drinkers that a coffee
that wasn't Kona would be easily recognizable and the
question remains as to how these companies did not know
that what they were purchasing was not Kona coffee,
especially when these roasters employ professional cuppers
and were spending millions of dollars on thousands of
pounds of Kona coffee annually. The other side of this
issue contends that this law suit may prove, in the
long run, to be detrimental to the coffee industry if
potential future customers of 100% Kona coffee are targeted
by the suit. Not ignoring the fact that if wrong was
done, that those who aided and abetted the fraud should
make amends, it is hoped by many that the industry does
not target the wrong companies or unsuspecting victims
and especially those who would, in turn, support the
local industry by purchasing and selling legitimate
Kona coffee.
The division over the law suit and whether or not it
should be pursued is but only one issue that now divides
the Kona coffee industry. Currently there are five organizations
who would like to lay claim to the governing body for
Kona Coffee. The coffee segment of the Kona County Farm
Bureau; The Hawaii Coffee Association, a group of state-wide
coffee companies, The Kona Coffee Council, a group of
local Kona coffee farmers, millers and roasters who
meet once a month to discuss coffee matters, and who
also regulate their own seal program; The Kona Coffee
Cultural Festival, who now not only handle the Kona
Coffee Festival but also administer a County-initiated
roasted certification seal and program begun by Mayor
Stephen Yamashiro, and the newly formed Kona Farmers
Alliance whose mission statement reads "A nonprofit
Kona community farming alliance whose purpose is to
protect the existence of agricultural land, farmers
and their products."
 |
 |
A perfect
example of the division between coffee organizations
are the two seals of Kona coffee authenticity that
exist. |
In addition to these several organizations, and the
two coffee authenticity certification seal programs,
the Department of Agriculture green coffee certification
program also exists. The issue of a mandatory certification
program being administered by one group will seemingly
allow for all the coffee in Kona to be tracked and guaranteed
to be authentic. For mainland roasters this would be
the ideal situation as they would have the ability to
check the authenticity of their product. Like the other
issues though, this measure is favored by some and opposed
by others who feel that the mandatory certification
is an infringement on their private businesses.
The obvious air of separatism that exists between all
of these groups and the play for power as governing
bodies, has left the Kona coffee industry divided, in
that it really has no sole representative group or platform
to discuss the issues. And although a consensus may
be met in the individual organizations it is obvious
that no consensus between the different groups has been
found, or they would be unilaterally aligned as one
organization working to promote and protect 100% Kona
coffee. From a marketing standpoint, the situation is
a nightmare for an industry that is trying to represent
itself in the world marketplace. Some uniformity and
code of ethics being fairly administered by one organization
would go a long way in the promotion of Kona coffee.
While a popular coffee union may or may not unite Kona
coffee farmers, an alternative argument can be made
for the strength of the industry, in that no one organization,
mill or company controls the Kona coffee industry. And,
as we have stated in past issues of Coffee Times it
is still this state of independence among the many different
facets of the Kona coffee industry that contributes
to its strength and growth today.
Another issue that seems to be of pressing concern,
is the renegotiation of Bishop Estate leases which are
now occurring between farmers and the land trust . A
close and scrutinizing eye is being kept upon Bishop
Estate as they are beginning to renegotiate the leases
of their tenants, many of whom have invested years in
developing their farms into sustainable businesses.

Captain Cook Coffee Company's
first truck. circa 1910, courtesy of Mr. Oue. |
Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop bequeathed her entire
estate to found and support a school for Hawaiian children.
This school became known as Kamehameha Schools, also
known as Bishop Estate. To fund and perpetuate this
school system, Bishop Estate utilizes nearly 265,000
acres of land on the Big Island of Hawaii both commercially
and non commercially. Out of this 265,000 acres 189,336
acres are used for agriculture. This land is or was
leased to approximately 900 farmers who grow a wide
range of products, including macadamia nuts, papaya,
sweet potato, taro, prawns and coffee. Since a small
percentage of this land is dedicated to coffee farm
leases, it is essential that farmers in Kona have the
opportunity to continue their farming practices at a
reasonable lease rate. Much attention has been paid
to this subject recently because initial renegotiations
with Bishop Estate have resulted in as much as 6 times
the original lease rates being handed down to farmers.
It is everyone's hope, that the principals of generating
sufficient income to provide operating funds to meet
current educational needs, and protecting and increasing
the trust corpus (asset base) for future educational
needs by which this land trust were set up, do not harm
the potential for keeping this land in agricultural
use and coffee, an economically viable crop. While representing
51 percent of Bishop Estate's total land holdings, the
agricultural lands generated only about 4.4 percent
of Bishop's total lease revenues in 1993. This 4.4 percent
may not have constituted much in the way of earnings
but the land which is still maintained under this agricultural
status supports more than Kamehameha Schools. It is
the maintenance of an agrarian life-style that is at
stake and the future of all of Hawaii's children, and
the communities they will live in, that will benefit
by this agricultural land maintenance.
If the Kona coffee community is to continue to grow
and prosper into the next century, a serious effort
will need to be applied to finding the answers to many,
if not all, of the questions that now divide the Kona
coffee community, which, in its division, is still gaining
strength as a region of independent coffee producers.
A little bit of cooperation amongst the different players
in the Kona coffee industry and from Bishop Estate,
a committed effort to protection of the name Kona, and
a standard of ethics adhered to by all involved in this
industry, Kona will do much more than just survive into
the twentieth century. The result of a concerted effort
by all will preserve the life-style that so many appreciate
along this rural farm belt in Hawaii.
Cherry
Fruit of the coffee tree bearing the coffee bean.
Approximately 78% of the gross weight of the product
is lost in the wet milling process.
Oct '97 Price: $1.10 - $1.20/lb.
|
 |
Parchment
Dry Membrane that surrounds the green coffee bean
after period of drying
Oct '97 Price: $6.00 - $7.00/lb.
|
 |
Green
The coffee bean before it is roasted and after
it has been dry hulled of it's parchment. 5 major
grades exist: Extra Fancy, Fancy, #1, Prime, and
Peaberry.
Oct '97 Price: $9.00 - $11.00/lb.
|
 |
Roast
The coffee bean after it has been cooked at a
temperature exceeding 400ºF. 20-25% of the
weight of the bean is lost in this process.
Oct '97 Price: $20.00 - $30.00/lb.
|
 |
"Readers
may submit editorial comments to any of our stories
by sending an email to les@lbdcoffee.com.
We would be happy to attach your comments and feedback
to anything we publish online. Thank you for your interest.":
Story
appeared originally in Coffee Times print magazine and
appears online for archival purposes only. Any use or
reprinting of these stories without the expressed written
consent of the author is prohibited.
|